It hasn't featured much in the media, but there is a new bill at the report stage in Parliament. It is called the Victims and Courts Bill and began its progress through the House of Commons in May. As regular readers of this blog know, I have been writing about mental health patients who commit unprovoked murders for a number of years. I have written about their crimes, the impact on their victims' families and the fact that many of these individuals "respond to treatment" and are released after several years, often to kill again.
One change postulated in the new bill, of particular concern to myself and many others, is a change in the law relating to the early release of these killers. As LBC note, the bill proposes:
"... removing the statutory right for victims to be informed about decisions concerning an offender’s detention, leave, or discharge.
Instead, such discretion would be left to hospital managers and probation services, with no legal obligation to inform, consult, or allow appeals from victims or families".
One such killer would be Valdo Calocane, who murdered the three innocent people seen in the pictures above: Barnaby Webber, 19, Grace O’Malley-Kumar, 19, and Ian Coates, 65. Emma Webber, mother of Barnaby, has described the putative change as "utterly outrageous". I totally concur in this, and share Ms Webber's view that it is all part of a wider failure to support victims and their families. As she goes on to say:
“So egregious are the failings by every single agency involved in every aspect of our tragedy that a statutory public inquiry is under way. A significant part of the inquiry will focus on the failings of ‘hospital managers’ and ‘clinicians’ who failed to do their jobs properly. Resulting in the monster who killed my beautiful child be allowed to roam the streets and hide in plain sight.”
I have no doubt that the relatives of other innocent victims are feeling the same way. One such relative, and campaigner on this issue, is Julian Hendy, who, along with other campaigners, has called on victims minister, Alex Davies-Jones, to amend the Bill to ensure victims are consulted, informed, and given the right to appeal when denied information.
“This isn’t just a loophole—it’s a kick in the teeth,” Mr Hendy said. We are talking about offenders who have been convicted of the most serious of crimes, which cause extreme concern amongst the public. This is not about punishment. It’s about basic fairness, compassion, and transparency. Victims and their families should not be shut out of decisions that affect their personal safety and recovery".
Now, I have written about this matter for a long time. I have come to see that for our media, and for a great number of people, this is not a major issue. After all, what does the murder of one, or several, people compare to the slaughter in Gaza, Russian war crimes in Ukraine or starvation in Africa? That has never been stated explicitly to me, but it's difficult to avoid assuming this question is being postulated as a valid query. If this question is being asked, though, there is a very simple answer.
The answer, of course, is that any one of us, or any one of our friends and relatives, could fall victim to these murderous mental health patients. We could be peaceably going about our business and suddenly, randomly, attacked and killed, for no good reason. I have written about these incidents often enough to be familiar with the details of these killings; many more can be read about on
Julian Hendy's "100 families" website.
My concern about the proposed change to the law is that of the victims' family members, as expressed by Emma Webber and Julian Hendy, but there is another angle. One example of the early release of a mental health killer (there are many others) is that of a man long forgotten by the media:
Robert Ashman. This man, in 2000, attacked Nigel Jones, MP (now Lord Jones) in his constituency office with a samurai sword. Jones was injured, but a local councillor,
Andrew Pennington, who went to help Jones, was killed. Incredibly, A
shman was released in 2008. Unlike others of his ilk that have been released, Ashman does not seem to have reoffended.
Now, Ashman's release was known to the public, and, presumably, to his victims' families - not that it would make matters any easier for them to know this killer was free to walk the streets.
But I ask the reader to imagine, if one of your relatives was killed by a murderous mental health patient and, after a relatively short period of incarceration, their murderer was released without your knowledge, how would you feel when you found out? You could find out indirectly, or you could be walking in the park, shopping in the supermarket, enjoying a pint in the pub, on the bus or train, etc, and unexpectedly encounter this individual. He or she would be rebuilding their lives, after taking the life of your family member. Horrible to contemplate, but it could happen. It would certainly, to quote Julian Hendy, feel like a kick in the teeth, however you found out - especially so, if the released murderer went on to kill again.
I hope the Victims and Courts Bill makes very slow progress through Parliament.