Monday, 12 November 2018

The Armistice, Remembrance and Me

The Hounslow War Memorial

I must own up: I have no personal connection to the Armistice of 1918. As far as I know, no forebears of mine died in the conflict. In fact, I don't even know of any who served in the armed forces in WW1. Nevertheless, I have had an abiding interest in that war, having read a number of books on the subject, even when I was too young to fully understand the surrounding issues. I seldom talk to anyone about WW1, though, as I don't like anoraks myself. These are the types who have an enthusiasm for some activity, eg, Jazz or sport, and at every opportunity will bore you by diverting conversation to that subject. If you have never met anyone like this, believe me, they exist.
In the 60s, WW1 came to signify meaningless carnage - the image of Tommies going over the top to be slaughtered epitomised the futility of war. An "anti-war" spirit towards the Great War pervaded popular culture, with productions such as "Oh, What a Lovely War!" and a revived interest in the poems of Siegfried Sassoon and Wilfred Owen, two of the greatest war poets in any language. The contemporary poet, Roger McGough, expressed the prevailing view of many in his poem "On Picnics":

"at the goingdown of the sun
and in the morning
I try to remember them
but their names are ordinary names
and their causes are thighbones
tugged excitedly from the soil
by frenchchildren
on picnics"

This does not mean that Roger McGough was himself callously indifferent to the fallen of WW1. On the contrary, anyone has read his poetry will know that he is deeply compassionate towards the victims of war, even writing about his own family members who suffered war's after effects. But this poem does sum up the attitude of many in the 60s - WW1 happened a long time ago; it was futile; the men and women who fell died for nothing, and they, like the war itself, should be forgotten.
This has been an enduring viewpoint, seen in films such as "Paths of Glory", "The Trench" and "Joyeux Noel". It can be heard in 80s songs like "Stop the Cavalry" (Jona Lewie), "The Children's Crusade" (Sting) and seen in the classic TV series of the 90s, "Blackadder Goes Forth".
What no-one took into account were the thoughts and feelings of survivors of the Great War. This view dismissed them as helpless victims - suckers, in other words. I cannot remember a single TV or radio programme that asked them whether they thought their hardship and sacrifice had been worth it or not; they were seemingly dismissed as being obsolete and irrelevant. Lyn Macdonald, in her marvellous book "To The Last Man", commented on this:
"In recent years I have listened in the company of (Great) war veterans to speeches which were kindly meant and expressed with real sincerity but whose sentiments have caused them pain...they realised long ago how difficult it can be to explain the concepts of loyalty, as they understood them..."
One positive result of the recent Armistice commemorations, as well as all other such events since 2014, has been to awaken a wider interest on the part of the general public towards those who fought in our name in WW1. There has been a greater debate on the rights and wrongs of Britain's entry to the conflict, and a boost in personal remembrance at public events and on social media. Many families have discovered more about long-forgotten forebears and learned to appreciate their sacrifice and suffering. Those forebears might have had "ordinary names", in Roger McGough's words, but they were people much like ourselves, in an extraordinary and nightmarish situation. It is as if, after the passage of a century, a barrier has been broken and a new bond has been formed.
For me, as far as I know, having no family members to remember, the barrier to the past was broken by my online work for Sefton Libraries: "Beyond the War Memorials", which I wrote about on April 29. Thanks to my work on the Waterloo and Seaforth War Memorial, and my investigations into the stories behind the names on that memorial, I had someone to remember. During the two minutes silence, I remembered them: Harold Joseph Wright, 14 years old, died on the Lusitania...Francis Zacharias, son of a German father and English mother...the gallant Walter Duncan, who escaped from German captivity...the brothers Andrew, Robert and Charles Cunningham, lost in France and Egypt...I thought of them all. A simple message on a wreath at Hounslow War Memorial summed up my feelings towards those newly important, if "ordinary" names:
And yet, while I now feel a much greater affinity and respect for our war dead, and fully appreciate the importance of commemorating the Armistice, I cannot help but reflect on the sadly unfulfilled hope of the combatants and survivors of 1914-18: that it would be the war to end wars. The violence went on in many places: Ireland, Turkey, Russia, Germany and the Baltic states. Warfare itself became even nastier, with civilians suffering an increased proportion of casualties. And, of course, the rise of Nazism in Germany led to WW2, partly, it is said, as a result of the terms imposed on the defeated Germans by the "victorious" Allies. But there was more to it than that. The C-in-C of US forces in France, General Pershing, said, in 1923:
"We never really let the Germans know who won the war. They are being told that their army was stabbed in the back, betrayed, that their army had not been defeated. The Germans never believed they were beaten. It will have to be done all over again.."
With the General's words in mind, I wrote this poem to mark the centenary of the 1918 Armistice:
ARMISTICE
Under fire from dawn,
We crouched in holes and slimy ditches
While spiteful bullets went buzzing overhead.
I prayed and sang with men and boys
Listening to the battle’s noise.
It stopped. Eleven a.m.
We sat for a while, bathing in silence,
Then slowly stood and cheered “The End”
And talked of going home again.
We sang “Goodbyeee” to sniper and shell,
Escapees from attritional hell.
Our foes stood up, side by side.
One German officer saluted and cried:
“Farewell, Tommy – we’ll meet again!”
And tried to control his wavering men.
The sun shone down with a friendly light
On souls emerging from endless night.
We shook their hands and said goodbye.
We drank a toast and wondered why
We’d had to fight.
They cheered, and marched off out of sight.
We drank more wine, and, gathered there,
The Padre led us all in prayer
For God to cause all wars to cease
And all mankind to live in peace.
But later, as I tried to sleep,
I thought long and I thought deep
Of the officer’s words before he went-
“We’ll meet again” – and what that meant.




The Tower of London, 11/11/2018. Photo by Bryan Morris.

4 comments:

  1. I don't disagree with most of this but this statement of yours is in my opinion misjudged:
    "This view dismissed them as helpless victims - suckers, in other words." That's not a view I've ever come across.

    Both of my grandfathers suffered serious, permanent injuries in WW1, and both died before their time: I never knew either of them.

    One of my English Literature 'O' Level texts was an anthology of WW1 poetry, and as background I read Robert Graves' autobiography, 'Goodbye To All That'. I also studied WW1 for 'A' Level and at college. I took my 'O' Levels in 1970, so I was studying WW1 poetry on the late 1960s. I have since read other memoirs by Siegfried Sassoon and Vera Brittain.

    I think you have misunderstood the attitude towards WW1 troops. It wasn't a dismissive 'suckers' - it was more a perception of 'Lions led by donkeys'. The WW1 poets were mostly junior officers and it is clear from the memoirs of those who wrote them that they respected the men under their command highly.

    'Oh! What A Lovely War' was partly influenced by the anti-Vietnam War sentiment at the time, but it was never intended to dismiss the troops either.

    If people didn't listen to the soldiers in the post-WW1 years, it's because everyone, including most of the ex-soldiers themselves, hoped to put it all behind them. Regrettably, with shell shock and what we now PTSD, it wasn't as simple as it seemed. However, you mustn't confuse the 'stiff upper lip' approach which still prevailed as late as the 50s with indifference or contempt.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think there is a problem of perception here. I don't believe that Owen, Sassoon, Joan Littlewood (Oh, What a Lovely War producer), Sting or Richard Curtis (Blackadder writer) intended to insult WW1 veterans by calling them suckers, any more than did Roger McGough in "Picnics". Also, you are right to say that many WW1 vets never talked about the war. A family friend, now dead, was at junior school in the 20s and 30s, and he told me that his teachers who were vets would not talk about the war. Yet, I must refer you to the Lyn MacDonald quote above. Mrs MacDonald has an outstanding reputation as a historian and is widely admired by other historians of the period. Her comments point out how many vets were upset at the way they were portrayed in popular fiction. If they were "Lions led by donkeys", that still implies they were animal-like for fighting in WW1 - or worse. The writer and WW1 vet, A P Herbert, refused to work on "Oh, What a Lovely war" because of what he perceived as negative, hindsight-driven images of those who fought. Another example occurred in the 90s with the production of "Blackadder Goes Forth". It is very funny, and makes some biting comments about the conduct of the war, but the characters are invariably negative. The officers are either cynics or congenital idiots, while the typical, ordinary Tommy is represented by the educationally challenged Baldrick. I accept that it was a comedy, but it is hardly a fair and realistic representation of the men who fought in the trenches. Many were highly, intelligent, cultured men who believed in the cause for which they fought.What all productions lacked was a sensitivity on the part of veterans how they would perceive these portrayals. If I had survived the trenches, I would have found all the songs, musicals, films and TV productions derogatory and - in the case of Baldrick - highly offensive. Lyn Macdonald hints at this in her books. I admire these works hugely, and still laugh at Baldrick and co, but we should recognise that they can convey other messages that some people found offensive. All WW1 veterans have passed away now, but I'm glad that I was able to learn more about them and to understand them better. Just because we no longer share their beliefs in duty and patriotism does not mean we cannot honour their sacrifice.

      Delete
  2. For God and Country we dedicate ourselves.... Thank you, all veterans, past, present, future.

    ReplyDelete