Friday, 24 June 2016

Cameron's Demise and a Victory for the Racist Right

I could not believe the news this morning. For me, a "Leave" vote was out of the question, and it just couldn't happen. Well, it happened, and I have had to adjust to the sight of the triumphalist rantings of Brexit politicians, all of whom are right of centre. What a crew! There is the effervescently gloating Nigel Farrage, as well as Boris Johnson, Chris Grayling, and other stars in the Tory firmament. Interestingly, all the smiling faces are either UKIP or Tory pundits - I have seen no Labour Brexiters as of yet. This political imbalance, as well as the fact that Donald Trump and Marine Le Pen have welcomed the referendum result, is highly significant.
As for David Cameron's falling on his sword, he reminds me of the "upper class twit of the year" in the famous Monty Python sketch who ran himself over with his own car. As Owen Jones says in today's "Guardian": "He called a referendum not because he thought it was in the national interest, but because it was useful to manage internal Conservative divisions. The referendum was inevitably framed as a struggle between two Conservative factions."
Cameron miscalculated disastrously, for himself as well as those of us who did not buy into the Brexit side's "case". I would have been delighted to see him leave his post after losing a General Election, but I am not happy to watch his departure from office in this way. As I said yesterday (it seems a different world today!),he should have shown some personal steel (and common sense) in resisting the pressure to hold the referendum in the first place. In actual fact, the referendum result is not legally binding, and if Cameron had been braver, he could have disregarded it. As Haroon Siddique has written:
"The simple answer to the question as to whether the EU referendum is legally binding is “no”. In theory, in the event of a vote to leave the EU, David Cameron, who opposes Brexit, could decide to ignore the will of the people and put the question to MPs banking on a majority deciding to remain.
This is because parliament is sovereign and referendums are generally not binding in the UK."
Some hopes of that...
So, where are we now? Well, we all know about the run on the pound, the unrest in the Stock market and rumblings of nationalist discontent in Scotland and Northern Ireland. We know, also, that  Nigel Farage has disowned a pledge to spend £350 million of European Union cash on the NHS after Brexit. As Jon Stone says in "The Independent":
"Nigel Farage has disowned a pledge to spend £350 million of European Union cash on the NHS after Brexit."
In fact, "Barrage" denies having made such a pledge. For a man who has condemned so many other politicians for being slippery and evasive, Nigel seems to have learned from them.
Like I said yesterday, so long ago now, this referendum has created divisions across the political spectrum. The result has caused turmoil in our political life, having already led to the removal of David Cameron from office, and the possible sacking of Jeremy Corbyn as leader of the Labour Party. But of particular concern, to me at least, is the nasty racist undercurrent that has accompanied the Brexit campaign. As one young Spanish lady said in a TV debate to Michael Gove:
"You are talking about us (EC migrants) as if we are enemies. I love this country".
Now, I accept that not all Brexit supporters are racists, but, as others besides me have pointed out, all racists are Brexit supporters. London voted to Remain yesterday, and some media pundits have given the misleading impression that the rest of the country voted to Leave. This is not the case, as many constituencies elsewhere in Britain (all in Scotland) voted Remain. The problem is that there was not enough of them. In many areas, including traditional Labour Party areas, the vote appears to have been swung by an antipathy to immigration. I do not believe that Nigel Farrage and his ilk are all racists, but they have shown that they know how to manipulate the racist vote. Brexit did particularly well in some depressed and disadvantaged areas, where there is a feeling that the native population (whoever they are) have been passed over in favour of immigrants.
This is a Europe-wide problem, and the Europe's far-right parties have been delighted at the victory for the Leave campaign. French National Front (FN) leader, Marine Le Pen tweeted: “Victory for freedom! As I have been asking for years, now we need to have the same referendum in France and in the countries of the EU.”
Presumably, the French equivalent will be called "Frexit". The FN's equivalents in the Netherlands, Germany (Alternative für Deutschland), the Sweden Democrats, the Danish People's Party and the neo-Nazi Golden Dawn in Greece are equally jubilant. The dogs of Europe are beginning to bark in unison. Donald Trump, who arrived in the UK today, the Daily Telegraph says:
 "Asked if he took heart from the result for his own campaign, Mr Trump said: “We're doing very well in the United States and essentially the same thing is happening in the United States."
We have been warned. Labour politicians who were misguided enough to support the Leave campaign should take note: they have helped the cause of the Right, in the USA, Europe and Britain immeasurably.
I conclude by looking at the impact this result is having upon the people that the Brexit campaign has targeted: EU migrants. This morning on TV, I saw a Polish couple who run a shop in Peterborough looking distinctly apprehensive about the fact that the town where they had lived for so long had voted decisively for Brexit. And not just EC migrants have cause to feel apprehensive. Joseph Harker, in the Guardian, says:
"Yes, the immigration issue has been about numbers coming from eastern Europe, and about people who don’t have English as their first language. But as anyone with a black or brown face knows, our nationality is regularly questioned, even when we’re born here: we are spoken about in phrases such as “immigrant communities”, and immigration stories carried in the media are commonly accompanied by images of black or Asian people, implicitly assuming they arrived from overseas."
The Brexit campaign, then, has potentially turned the clock back several decades to the days when Enoch Powell was the darling of the racist right, and the National Front (NF) appeared on our streets. That is David Cameron's final contribution to British politics. Thanks, Dave.

5 comments:

  1. An interesting article because it raises issues which are highly complex and terms which are very hard to define. I will discuss immigration as it is usually the most emotive and to do so will vaguely define some terms I will use.
    Race - does this term have any scientific basis? However the term racist is often used to describe people who are uneasy or downright hostile about/to immigration/immigrants. Culture - I suppose this is an amalgam of history, language, religion, art, and possibly ethics and more. National Identity - is there a reason why a person from Warsaw, watching an international football match, proudly sing the Polish National Anthem and declare him/herself a native of Poland. Or is there a difference in calling yourself a Polish national? Whatever, an indigenous Pole will have been immersed in Polish culture from birth and usually have a strong sense of National identity - there are always exceptions.
    Now for an analogy of the possible effects upon an indigenous population by a large surge in the number of immigrants into a certain area; It is discovered that Ziconium, a rare and precious metal is present in the slate mines situated near Betsy Co-ed. 1000000 Young English males descend upon this region to make their fortune. For some reason the native population (that is the Welsh - whoever they are) resent this influx. Hospitals are under major stress due to the number of accidents occurring with these amateur miners. They are discontent with the lack of planning by the authorities who excuse the deficiencies in the infrastructure of North Wales by stating that they cannot plan for uncontrolled and hence unknown numbers of legitimate English nationals migrating to North Wales. The Welsh media run stories depicting people who wear bowler hats and carry a brolly implicitly assuming they arrived from the other side of Offa's Dyke. A Wexit campaign is begun on social media turning the clock back to the days of burning English owned second homes. The native Welsh ( whoever they are ) vote by a 4% margin to exit the UK. The Remain voters call these 'exiters' racist and want a second referendum and, being democratic, wish for the 'will of the people' to be disregarded by the Welsh Assembly
    (While all the above has being going on - the Scots (whoever they may be ) decide to vote to leave the UK, become a separate Sovereign Nation and then submerge their sovereignty instantaneously in a European Supranational organisation along with millions of other European Nationals (whoever they may be ).

    Readers may find the above frivolous and/or humourless, the following is not.
    There is an unelected political elite that is named the European Council of Ministers that for idealistic reasons wish to create a European Federal State ( prevention of European wars is a laudable aim ). This may have to be achieved by weakening National identity ( possibly another laudable aim). However, whatever the ideal that is to be achieved, the progress towards this ideal must be done at a pace which does not create social divisions nor give rise to extreme political views. The high levels of youth unemployment in southern European countries, the rise in popularity of Fascist parties are only 2 indicators that indicate a massive failure by this European political elite. A third is the Brexit result - it was a shock to some of the British political elite. How out of touch does it make them? If there were issues to be addressed to prevent a Leave vote, why did the politicians not address these issues? - they have had over 40 years. There are many distinct ethnic communities all around the UK -Polish/Chinese/Ukrainian/Jewish/Asian that have existed for many years in a mainly tolerant atmosphere. The majority of British nationals are not racist but they have given no mandate to any political party for uncontrolled immigration of peoples of any race/culture as far as I know.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Phil - I think you might like to see this story: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/troubling-stories-everyone-should-read-8294187 Britain's racists are crawling out from under their stones, as they feel the "Leave" vote has given them a green light to do so. I hardly think that you can blame Brussels or Strasbourg for that.

      Delete
  2. Come on Geoff, you can do better than this. You are too intelligent to have missed the irony of my allegory and surely your readers will be too intelligent to miss the naivety of your conflation.
    Geoff, just because you are so enamoured with the positives of the EU does not mean you should dismiss the negatives - you are a Historian', allow your training to kick in.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm flattered that you think of me as a historian, Phil! I'm not enamoured with the EC, but worried about the rise of nationalism. As we remember the fallen of the Somme battle today, I fervently hope that we never return to the nationalist rivalry of WW1. I hope that my readers will pick up on that concern. being a scientist yourself, please analyse the elements involved in this experiment to leave the EU. Many of the elements (i.e. political parties) seek to return to such a situation. The only people to benefit from our leaving the EU are the political Right and the even further Right. My training leads me to see that as a warning sign. "Those who forget the past are condemned to repeat it" - George Santayana.

      Delete
  3. Geoff, I rarely if ever flatter.

    Thugs, sorry mental retards, will attack innocents whatever the excuse - colour of hair/skin, accent, religious apparel, etc. This 'racial' difference intolerance does appear to be the preserve of those thugs on the right of the political spectrum. The mass murder of innocents due to political differences or for the 'greater good' appears to be a preserve of the left - each to their own.

    Any observer of the behaviour of European peoples will note that National Identity exists and is important to large swathes of the European populace. In an attempt to 'control/neutralise' nationalism, so as to prevent another Somme, politicians have attempted a unique experiment. I and many other UK citizens voted 40 years ago to support this journey into the unknown.
    The anger at being thwarted by an unelected (male) political elite nearly leads to becoming irrational in discussion. The rise in popularity of Fascist parties, rise of youth unemployment, non control of European borders, political ineptitude regarding Turkey and the Ukraine, followed by shock at the result of Brexit reveals a political class that are out of touch with their electorate.
    I have recently listened to a University of Liverpool Law Lecturer giving me an exercise in the statistical correlation between being disingenuous and vocalising Umm. Extolling the UK's regional political health and dynamism while skirting over the sectarian voting patterns of where this 'Lawyer' originated from - give me strength.

    ReplyDelete