Image created by Neville Grundy. Thanks, Nev.
"The attacker (Salvador Ramos) shot dead 19 students and two teachers, and injured at least 17 more people. Further tragedy struck two days later, when the husband of one of the murdered teachers died of a heart attack".
This attack has once again highlighted the appalling phenomenon of repeated mass shootings in the USA. As of last Tuesday, there have been 212 such attacks this year, This is using the criterion of a mass shooting as being an incident in which four or more people were shot or killed, excluding the shooter. Among these 212 attacks, there were 27 school shootings. The NPR website expands on this:
"As for school shootings, according to Education Week, 2021 had 34 such incidents at educational institutions (the highest since the organization started its database). In 2020, there were 10 shootings. Both 2019 and 2018 recorded 24 shootings".
Living in a country which has only ever experienced one such atrocity - the Dunblane School massacre of 1996, these attacks set the mind reeling. Even more staggering is it to be reminded of just how prevalent death by firearm is in America. The BBC comments:"Firearms deaths are a fixture in American life.There were 1.5 million of them between 1968 and 2017 - that's higher than the number of soldiers killed in every US conflict since the American War for Independence in 1775."
By no means should we think that people in the United States are complacent about these horrifying occurrences. Even today, there are angry voices of protest being raised against the ease with which guns can be purchased. For me, sadly, it brings a feeling of Deja vous. This horrible crime at Robb Elementary School brings memories of "Bowling for Columbine" (Click link to watch whole film). This 2002 documentary looked at the events of April 20,1999, when two teenagers shot dead 15 people and wounded 21 more at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado. The film maker, Michael Moore, was rightly praised and won an Oscar for his efforts to portray the events, causes and consequences of the massacre. One significant moment, at least for me, was the dialogue between Moore and the father of a boy who had died in the slaughter. They were discussing why it was that such attacks were so frequent in the USA: "What is it?" "What is it?". After first seeing the film in 2005, I had some hopes that the coverage in depth of this tragedy might lead to less of these atrocities. As events have shown, my hopes were misplaced. Following the Uvalde attack, Michael Moore is calling for the abolition of the Second Amendment of the US Constitution - the clause revered by US gun lovers.
By a strange coincidence, the main opposition group to gun control in the USA - the National Rifle Association - features in both narratives. Shortly after the Columbine attacks, the NRA held a conference in Denver, Colorado, addressed by Charlton Heston. On Friday, the same organisation held a conference in Houston, Texas, this time addressed by ex-President Trump. Both these events showed stunning callousness and tactlessness on the part of the NRA. Trump showed unbelievable, if predictable, indifference to the suffering of the relatives of the victims at Robb Elementary School by saying, as CNBC reported:
“The existence of evil in our world is not a reason to disarm law-abiding citizens,” Trump said at the NRA convention. “The existence of evil is one of the very best reasons to arm law-abiding citizens.”
If Trump's logic were valid, the USA would be one of the safest countries on the planet. It is nothing of the kind, as the high gun crime figures quoted above clearly show, Whether Trump and the NRA like it or not, there is an undeniable link between those crime figures and gun ownership. One glance at the BBC chart above shows that the US has the highest ratio of gun ownership in the world: 120.5 firearms per 100 residents. The chart relates to 2018, but experts say that millions more US citizens have acquired guns since then. Quite how Trump and the NRA can assert that evil is being deterred, when all the evidence is against it, beggars belief. The mass shootings, and the daily toll of people shot in single victim gun attacks (estimates put it as high as 60 a day) prove them wrong. Yet, even among onlookers at the Uvalde school massacre, there were voices raised saying "guns don't kill people, people kill people". It's difficult to feel optimistic that gun control will happen in America any time soon.
While, rightly, we focus upon these terrible events on the US mainland, it is only fair that we look at gun violence as an international phenomenon. Liberal gun laws in some US states are causing America's gun problem to be exported. The recipient countries are, for the most part, America's Central American neighbours. As Ioan Grillo wrote in The Guardian last year: "An iron river of illegal guns flows from the US to Mexico, Central America, and across the hemisphere, helping make the Americas the world’s most homicidal region, with 47 of the world’s 50 most murderous cities".
And, as Grillo goes on to say, this state of affairs has serious repercussions for the United States:
"Thousands flee violence in the Northern Triangle of Central America - Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala – and seek asylum in the US, adding to the pressure of undocumented migrants."For a worldwide perspective, we can turn to the "Gun Violence - Key Facts" document, published by Amnesty International. Five sobering facts stand out:
"More than 500 people die every day from gun violence.
44% of all homicides globally involve gun violence.
There were 1.4 million firearm-related deaths globally between 2012 and 2016.
44% of all homicides globally involve gun violence.
There were 1.4 million firearm-related deaths globally between 2012 and 2016.
An estimated 2,000 people are injured by gunshots every single day
At least 2 million people are living with firearm injuries around the globe".
At least 2 million people are living with firearm injuries around the globe".
The document points out the fact that the American NRA and others choose to deny:
"Easy access to firearms – whether legal or illegal – is one of the main drivers of gun violence".The report further goes on to say that in countries with strict gun controls, i.e. much of Western Europe including the UK, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, South Korea and Singapore, the rate of gun violence is extremely low.
Now, as we know, handgun ownership in the UK was curtailed after the Dunblane School massacre of 1996. The only politician of any note who has expressed an interest in reversing the ban was none other than Nigel Farage, back in 2014, when he was the leader of UKIP. Perhaps the best voice to close this blog item is that of Mick North, whose 5-year old daughter, Sophie, was one of the 16 children killed in the Dunblane Massacre:
"Following the shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas high school in Florida in 2018, I wrote a speech which included the following lines: “We’re always being told of America’s love affair with the gun, yet from over here it looks more like an abusive relationship, one that causes too much pain, misery and death. Seize the opportunity and change that relationship now, and allow your children to look towards a safer future.”Amen.
.
You state that Farage was the only politician of note (although I'd use the term 'notoriety') to oppose the UK's handgun ban in the wake of the Dunblane Massacre, but Boris Johnson wrote in the Daily Telegraph on 15 September 1997 that “Nanny is confiscating their toys. It is like one of those vast Indian programmes of compulsory vasectomy.” This has been fact-checked and is accurate.
ReplyDeleteAs for “guns don't kill people – people kill people”. This is disingenuous, deliberately missing the point that a lunatic with an assault rifle can murder dozens of people from afar with relative impunity, while a killer without a firearm can usually only murder someone within arm's reach.
Gun addicts argue that bearing arms is their constitutional right, as though the Second Amendment were handed down to them by the Almighty, rather than just something drafted by humans. I wish they'd read it: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” No one can argue that the murderer at Robb Elementary School was part of a well regulated militia, so the only logical conclusion is that gun addicts regard the ongoing carnage as a price worth paying.
The trouble is that it's not just gun nuts who buy guns in America. Even people who favour gun control are buying guns for self- and home defence. Before we point the finger (and that includes me), we need to bear in mind that gun crime in the US is not confined to mass school shootings. Gun crimes happen all the time in America, leading to about 60 deaths a day. An American friend contacted me yesterday, saying that there were 40 shootings in the city of Philadelphia last weekend, leading to 17 deaths. An illegal handgun here in the UK costs about £5000; in the US, they can be bought for as little as $5 - my friend says that children are acquiring them. He and his wife are supporters of gun control, yet he himself is talking of buying a gun for protection. It's too easy for us to criticise this, but they are living in a situation that we, happily, don't have to face.
ReplyDeleteI think I should admit to something relevant here - an admission, but not a confession. Until after the Dunblane massacre, I was a handgun owner. I was sorry to relinquish my firearm, but I am a law-abiding person, and accepted there was a need for it. The Hungerford and Dunblane atrocities showed that even stringent security checks on gunowners cannot detect an individual's descent into madness. However, I felt safer when I had a gun in my home, and I don't blame law-abiding Americans for buying guns for protection. In the UK, the vast majority of burglars do not carry weapons and will flee if challenged; in the USA, there is an inordinately high risk that the intruder to your home has a gun and is prepared to use it.
I've never felt unsafe in my life in the UK to the extent that I'd feel I'd need a gun. Beyond that, your response to my comment misses the point I was trying to make.
ReplyDeleteThat's because I was making a different point. I have no argument with the point you raised.
ReplyDeleteI read quite a few years ago that American householders who owned guns for protection were more likely to die violent deaths than those who didn't - sometimes killed by their own guns.
ReplyDeleteIn the event of a major marital bust-up, one spouse might in a fit of fury take the gun to the other. Furthermore, if an intruder has broken in for the purposes of theft and is approached by the householder with a gun, he is more likely to fire than if he were faced by an unarmed person on the basis of 'shoot first or be shot'. Such a criminal is also more likely to be familiar with using a gun.
In a society that allows widespread gun ownership, owning one for safety reasons can, and sometimes does, backfire on the owner.